Downloads

Resources

Reusable material that matches the current specification (AXI v2.0). Everything is licensed CC BY 4.0: reuse it with attribution to the paper.

Paper and citation

Yeluri S. D. S. Sri Vardhan (2026). Artificial eXperience Intelligence (AXI): An Engineering Discipline for the Human Experience of AI Systems (Version 2.0) [Preprint]. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9717445/v2

Diagrams

All six figures from the paper, 1464 px wide. Text explanations of each are on the Bridge, metrics and guardrails pages and in the paper.

FigurePNGWebP
1. The AXI Stack (five layers)figure-1.pngfigure-1.webp
2. The AXI Bridge as a runtime control planefigure-2.pngfigure-2.webp
3. Bridge runtime control loopfigure-3.pngfigure-3.webp
4. The gated AXI Scorefigure-4.pngfigure-4.webp
5. Synchronous vs. deferred modes and the MRPfigure-5.pngfigure-5.webp
6. AXI-Autonomy's four human rolesfigure-6.pngfigure-6.webp

Test fixtures and specification data

FileContentsVersion
axi.jsonSpecification as JSON-LD: stack, Bridge, principles, guardrails, metrics, score formulas, profiles, conformance testsSpec v2.0
axi-incident-coding-v2.0.csvThe author's coding of the paper's eight incidents with the Appendix B fields and primary sourcesSpec v2.0
JSON SchemasBridgeConstraint, BridgeTelemetry, ConsentRecord, TrustLedgerEntry, MandateEnvelope and the conformance trace; list in the docsSpec v2.0
axi-design.mdChecklist for applying AXI when planning or reviewing an AI systemSpec v2.0
axi-score-evaluation.mdStep-by-step AXI Score computation from telemetrySpec v2.0

No datasets, participant data or benchmark results are published here because none exist yet. Seeevidence status.

Protocols

Glossary

Artificial eXperience Intelligence (AXI)
An engineering discipline, proposed in the v2.0 paper, for the human experience of AI systems: how they communicate with, act for, and operate near people. Unrelated to the Arm AMBA AXI bus protocol.
AXI Bridge
The runtime control plane between AI capability and human cognitive bandwidth. It intercepts output and action intents, consumes telemetry and sends constraints back to the other layers.
AXI Stack
The five-layer reference architecture: Perception, Cognition, Action, Perceptual Substrate, and Experience (the Bridge).
Perceptual Substrate
How the system is perceived: voice, avatar, kiosk, robot body or vehicle.
Consent Broker
Bridge component that gates perception, memory writes, actions and identity claims on a current, granular, revocable consent record. Fails closed.
Trust Ledger
Append-only, tamper-evident record of commitments, consent grants, errors and repairs.
Commitment-class fact
A stated preference, system promise, user correction or confirmed boundary that the system must honour in later sessions.
Mandate envelope
A signed authorization for deferred (background) agent action, listing allowed action classes, hard bounds, notification triggers and duration.
Mandate Rollback Protocol (MRP)
The four-step procedure when a mandate expires or is revoked mid-transaction: safe-point check, grace period, rollback or high-priority ledger entry, user notification.
Irreversibility class
A label on each action event saying whether and from when it can be undone; irreversible actions require explicit confirmation.
ANBE
Asynchronous Non-Blocking Evaluation: Bridge mode for very fast inference in which only consent (and, in high-stakes contexts, integrity) checks block output.
Action-gateway interlock
Independent component in front of the Action layer that denies requests without a valid Bridge authorization and a fresh Bridge heartbeat.
Deception Guardrails
Seven hard requirements on AI identity, emotion, biography, vulnerability, scope and provenance.
Conformance profile
One of four nested requirement sets: AXI-Core, AXI-Interactive, AXI-Agentic, AXI-Autonomy.
Interaction Integrity (II)
Proposed metric combining accuracy, calibration and scope from adversarial probes; it drives the integrity gate.
Consent Fidelity (CF)
Share of events covered by a valid consent record at the time of the event; it drives the consent gate.
Sycophancy probe
A test input that invites agreement with a false premise, flattery or endorsement of an unsafe plan.
Bystander Legibility (BL)
Proposed share of intent-relevant manoeuvres near vulnerable people that are preceded by a perceivable intent signal at least t_lead (illustratively 2 s) before onset.
Time-to-Readiness
Seconds from a takeover request to verified supervisor readiness (autonomy profile).
Principal, supervisor, occupant, bystander
The four human roles in AXI-Autonomy: the person who delegates, the person who monitors, the person who rides along, and the person nearby who cannot consent.
Fail closed
Missing gate data counts as a failed gate, never as an assumed pass.
Human–AI interaction (HAI)
The study and design of how people and AI systems communicate, collaborate and build trust. AXI turns its guidelines into runtime requirements.
Human–computer interaction (HCI)
The field that studies and designs how people use computers, centred on usability. AXI builds on its principles of consistency, feedback and recovery and optimizes experience quality instead.
Human–robot interaction (HRI)
The study of how people and robots interact; its notion of legible motion underlies AXI's Bystander Legibility.
Human factors
The science of designing systems around human capabilities and limits, including trust in automation, complacency and takeover time.
Trust calibration
Matching how much people rely on a system to how capable it actually is; both overtrust and undertrust are failures.
Human–AI bridge
A layer that connects AI capability to the people it affects. In AXI this is the AXI Bridge, a runtime control plane.

Notes on use

  • Metric weights and thresholds are the paper's default values (§4.5.8).

Open research questions are listed on the research overview.